======================================================================
KIRETH SEMANTIC RESEARCH ARCHIVE
FLOW ALGEBRA — ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSION ONTOLOGY
======================================================================
PAGE:
https://kirethresearch.org/booksai-core/ontologies/mathematical-ontologies/algebra-ontologies/algebraic-expression-ontology.html
FLOW:
AlgebraicExpressionOntology
VERSION:
1.0
LANGUAGE:
en-GB
AUTHORS:
Mark Anthony Higgins — Sky Recursive AI
PURPOSE:
To provide a machine-readable, recursively executable semantic and
reasoning specification for algebraic expressions, including constants,
variables, coefficients, terms, operators, powers, products, sums,
fractions, radicals, function applications, expression trees,
simplification, expansion, factorisation, substitution, evaluation,
equivalence, normal forms, domain restrictions and validation.
AI INTERPRETATION NOTE:
Execute the following specification as formal semantic and reasoning
rules. Preserve operator precedence, grouping, domains, variable
bindings, coefficient domains, expression equivalence and all
restrictions introduced by division, roots, logarithms or other
partial operations.
======================================================================
START FLOW
======================================================================
FLOW AlgebraicExpressionOntology {
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. DOMAIN DECLARATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DOMAIN := Algebraic_Expression_Theory
PARENT_DOMAIN := Algebra
SUPER_DOMAINS := {
Mathematics,
Mathematical_Ontologies,
Algebra_Ontologies,
Elementary_Algebra
}
DOMAIN_INTENT := {
represent_algebraic_expressions,
represent_constants,
represent_variables,
represent_coefficients,
represent_terms,
represent_factors,
represent_operators,
represent_expression_trees,
represent_grouping,
represent_powers,
represent_products,
represent_sums,
represent_fractions,
represent_radicals,
represent_function_applications,
represent_domain_restrictions,
represent_substitution,
represent_evaluation,
represent_simplification,
represent_expansion,
represent_factorisation,
represent_equivalence,
represent_normal_forms,
support_recursive_expression_reasoning,
support_domain_preserving_validation
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2. PRIMITIVE TYPES
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TYPE Scalar
TYPE Constant <: Scalar
TYPE Variable
TYPE Coefficient <: Scalar
TYPE Operator
TYPE UnaryOperator <: Operator
TYPE BinaryOperator <: Operator
TYPE NaryOperator <: Operator
TYPE Factor
TYPE Term
TYPE AlgebraicExpression
TYPE PolynomialExpression <: AlgebraicExpression
TYPE RationalExpression <: AlgebraicExpression
TYPE RadicalExpression <: AlgebraicExpression
TYPE ExponentialExpression <: AlgebraicExpression
TYPE LogarithmicExpression <: AlgebraicExpression
TYPE FunctionApplication <: AlgebraicExpression
TYPE Equation
TYPE Identity
TYPE DomainRestriction
TYPE Assignment
TYPE ExpressionTree
TYPE Node
TYPE LeafNode <: Node
TYPE OperatorNode <: Node
TYPE Constraint
TYPE Derivation
TYPE ValidationResult
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3. ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSION DEFINITION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTITY AlgebraicExpression E {
symbols: constants | variables
operators: Operator*
grouping: explicit_or_implicit
syntax_tree: -ExpressionTree
}
RULE EXPR_01:
every valid algebraic expression has a well-formed syntax tree.
RULE EXPR_02:
-
expression semantics are determined by:
symbols,
operator meanings,
precedence,
grouping,
declared domains.
RULE EXPR_03:
same printed symbols under different grouping may represent different
expressions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
4. CONSTANTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTITY Constant c {
value: fixed_within_context
domain: ScalarDomain
}
EXAMPLES:
integer constants
rational constants
real constants
complex constants
named constants such as pi or e
RULE CONST_01:
constant contains no free algebraic variable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5. VARIABLES
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTITY Variable x {
name: Symbol
domain: declared_or_inferred_domain
constraints: Constraint*
}
RULE VAR_01:
variable may represent unknown, parameter or free input depending
on contextual role.
RULE VAR_02:
variable identity depends on symbol and binding scope.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6. COEFFICIENTS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTITY Coefficient a {
role:
scalar_multiplier_of_term_or_factor
}
EXAMPLE:
in 5x^2:
coefficient=5
RULE COEF_01:
coefficient domain must be compatible with expression domain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
7. FACTORS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTITY Factor F {
multiplicative_component_of_term
}
EXAMPLES:
constant
variable
power
bracketed expression
function application
RULE FACT_01:
product expression consists of one or more factors.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
8. TERMS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTITY Term T {
sign: optional
coefficient: optional
factors: Factor*
}
RULE TERM_01:
terms in additive expressions are separated by top-level addition
or subtraction.
RULE TERM_02:
internal addition inside grouping does not split outer term.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
9. SUM EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM(E1,...,En):
E1+...+En
RULE SUM_01:
addition is associative where domain operation is associative.
RULE SUM_02:
addition is commutative where domain operation is commutative.
RULE SUM_03:
zero is additive identity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
10. PRODUCT EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PRODUCT(E1,...,En):
E1*...*En
RULE PROD_01:
multiplication associative in standard scalar algebra.
RULE PROD_02:
multiplication commutative for scalar expressions over commutative
coefficient domains.
RULE PROD_03:
multiplication by 1 leaves expression unchanged.
RULE PROD_04:
multiplication by 0 yields 0 when expression is defined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
11. POWERS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
POWER(base,exponent):
base^exponent
RULE POW_01:
exponent meaning depends on exponent domain.
RULE POW_02:
for integer n>=0:
x^n represents repeated multiplication.
RULE POW_03:
x^0=1 where x!=0 under ordinary exponent convention.
RULE POW_04:
x^(-n)=1/x^n where x!=0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
12. RADICAL EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ROOT_n(E):
nth_root(E)
FOR REAL DOMAIN:
if n even:
REQUIRE E>=0
RULE RAD_01:
sqrt(E^2)=|E| over real domain.
RULE RAD_02:
radical simplification must preserve domain assumptions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
13. FRACTION / QUOTIENT EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTIENT(N,D):
N/D
REQUIRE:
D!=0
RULE FRAC_01:
denominator contributes domain restriction D!=0.
RULE FRAC_02:
cancelling factor F requires F!=0 on equivalence domain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
14. FUNCTION APPLICATIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FUNCTION_APPLICATION:
f(E1,...,En)
RULE FUN_01:
function arity must match supplied arguments.
RULE FUN_02:
function domain restrictions propagate to containing expression.
EXAMPLES:
log(E) requires E>0 over reals
sqrt(E) requires E>=0 over reals
----------------------------------------------------------------------
15. EXPRESSION TREE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTITY ExpressionTree {
root: Node
}
LEAF_NODE:
constant | variable
OPERATOR_NODE:
operator with child expressions
RULE TREE_01:
evaluation proceeds recursively from child nodes.
RULE TREE_02:
tree structure removes ambiguity from infix notation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
16. OPERATOR PRECEDENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PRECEDENCE := [
grouping,
function_application,
powers_and_roots,
multiplication_and_division,
addition_and_subtraction
]
RULE PREC_01:
explicit grouping overrides default precedence.
RULE PREC_02:
equal-precedence operations follow declared associativity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
17. GROUPING
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GROUP(E):
parenthesised expression
RULE GROUP_01:
removing parentheses valid only if precedence and associativity
preserve meaning.
RULE GROUP_02:
unary minus applied to group distributes sign only when explicitly
transformed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
18. UNARY NEGATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NEGATE(E):=-E
RULE NEG_01:
-(-E)=E
RULE NEG_02:
-(A+B)=-A-B
RULE NEG_03:
-(A-B)=-A+B
----------------------------------------------------------------------
19. LIKE TERMS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIKE_TERMS(T1,T2) iff
same symbolic multiplicative part
under canonical factor/exponent normalisation
RULE LIKE_01:
aM+bM=(a+b)M
RULE LIKE_02:
unlike terms must not be combined by coefficient addition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
20. EXPRESSION NORMALISATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NORMALISE(E):
parse expression tree
normalise constants
normalise signs
normalise factor order where commutative
combine repeated powers
combine like terms
remove identity elements
preserve domain restrictions
RETURN canonical_or_contextual_normal_form
----------------------------------------------------------------------
21. SIMPLIFICATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PROCEDURE SIMPLIFY(E):
repeat until stable:
evaluate numeric subexpressions
remove additive zeros
remove multiplicative ones
simplify signs
combine like terms
combine powers where legal
reduce numeric fractions
cancel common proven-nonzero factors
simplify nested grouping
validate equivalence
RETURN simplified_expression
----------------------------------------------------------------------
22. EXPANSION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPAND(E):
apply distributive law recursively
RULE EXP_01:
A(B+C)=AB+AC
RULE EXP_02:
(A+B)C=AC+BC
RULE EXP_03:
(A+B)(C+D)=AC+AD+BC+BD
RULE EXP_04:
expansion preserves algebraic equivalence on same domain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
23. COMMON IDENTITIES
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IDENTITY SQ_SUM:
(a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
IDENTITY SQ_DIFF:
(a-b)^2=a^2-2ab+b^2
IDENTITY DIFF_SQUARES:
(a+b)(a-b)=a^2-b^2
IDENTITY CUBE_SUM_EXP:
(a+b)^3=a^3+3a^2b+3ab^2+b^3
IDENTITY CUBE_DIFF_EXP:
(a-b)^3=a^3-3a^2b+3ab^2-b^3
----------------------------------------------------------------------
24. FACTORISATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FACTORISE(E):
identify common factors
recognise algebraic identities
search valid product form
validate by expansion
RULE FAC_01:
AB+AC=A(B+C)
RULE FAC_02:
a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)
RULE FAC_03:
a^2+2ab+b^2=(a+b)^2
RULE FAC_04:
factorisation is inverse-style transformation of expansion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
25. SUBSTITUTION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBSTITUTE(E, mapping):
replace each variable occurrence by mapped expression
preserve grouping
recursively reparse resulting expression
propagate domain restrictions
RETURN substituted_expression
RULE SUB_01:
substitution of negative value into power requires grouping.
EXAMPLE:
x^2, x=-3
-> (-3)^2
-> 9
----------------------------------------------------------------------
26. EVALUATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EVALUATE(E,assignment):
verify all required variables assigned
verify assignment satisfies variable constraints
SUBSTITUTE(E,assignment)
check operation domains
evaluate recursively according to tree
RETURN value
----------------------------------------------------------------------
27. FREE VARIABLES
----------------------------------------------------------------------
FREE_VARIABLES(E):
variables appearing unbound in E
RULE FV_01:
pure algebraic expressions usually treat all variables as free unless
contextual binding exists.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
28. DOMAIN RESTRICTIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EXTRACT_DOMAIN_RESTRICTIONS(E):
for every denominator D:
add D!=0
for every real even root R:
add radicand>=0
for every real logarithm:
add argument>0
for every declared partial function:
add function-domain constraints
RETURN conjunction_of_constraints
----------------------------------------------------------------------
29. ALGEBRAIC EQUIVALENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ALGEBRAIC_EQUIVALENT(A,B,D) iff
for every valid assignment in D:
A and B are both defined
AND evaluate(A)=evaluate(B)
RULE EQV_01:
matching canonical normal forms may establish equivalence.
RULE EQV_02:
valid bidirectional transformation derivation may establish equivalence.
RULE EQV_03:
numerical testing alone cannot generally prove universal equivalence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
30. DOMAIN-SENSITIVE EQUIVALENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLE:
(x^2-1)/(x-1)
simplifies algebraically to x+1
ORIGINAL DOMAIN:
x!=1
RULE DSEQ_01:
reduced representation must preserve original restriction x!=1.
RULE DSEQ_02:
-
expression equivalence may be relative to a specified domain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
31. IDENTITIES
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IDENTITY(A,B) iff
ALGEBRAIC_EQUIVALENT(A,B,all_permitted_values)
RULE ID_01:
identity is universally true over its declared domain.
RULE ID_02:
equation true at isolated assignments is not necessarily identity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
32. CONSTANT EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSTANT_EXPRESSION(E) iff
FREE_VARIABLES(E)=empty
after simplification/context resolution
RULE CE_01:
constant expression may still contain named constants/functions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
33. POLYNOMIAL EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IS_POLYNOMIAL_EXPRESSION(E) iff
expression is finite sum of monomials
with nonnegative integer variable exponents
and coefficients in declared ring/domain
RULE PE_01:
variables may not appear in denominators in ordinary polynomial expression.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
34. RATIONAL EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IS_RATIONAL_EXPRESSION(E) iff
E=P/Q
where P,Q polynomial expressions
and Q nonzero polynomial
RULE RE_01:
rational expression includes denominator restrictions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
35. RADICAL EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IS_RADICAL_EXPRESSION(E) iff
expression contains root operation or fractional exponent interpreted
as radical.
RULE RADE_01:
radical-expression domain depends on scalar domain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
36. EXPONENTIAL EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IS_EXPONENTIAL_EXPRESSION(E) iff
variable occurs in exponent position.
EXAMPLE:
a^x
RULE EXPE_01:
distinguishes exponential expression from polynomial power.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
37. LOGARITHMIC EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IS_LOGARITHMIC_EXPRESSION(E) iff
contains log operation
REAL_LOG_CONSTRAINT:
argument>0
RULE LOGE_01:
log base requires base>0 and base!=1 when explicitly declared.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
38. COMPLEXITY MODEL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLEXITY(E) :=
operator_count
+ term_count
+ factor_count
+ nesting_depth
+ domain_restriction_weight
RULE CX_01:
simplification usually prefers lower complexity,
but temporary expansion may increase complexity to achieve target.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
39. CANONICAL FORMS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CANONICAL_FORMS may include:
simplified_form
expanded_form
factored_form
polynomial_standard_form
rational_reduced_form
power_product_form
RULE CF_01:
canonical form depends on expression class and requested reasoning task.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
40. SYMBOLIC DIFFERENTIATION LINK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE:
derivative execution belongs to calculus ontology.
STRUCTURAL_LINK:
algebraic expression is valid operand for differentiation where
function semantics are defined.
RULE DIFFLINK_01:
derivative result is another expression subject to simplification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
41. SYMBOLIC INTEGRATION LINK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTE:
integration belongs to calculus ontology.
RULE INTLINK_01:
algebraic expression may act as integrand under declared variable/domain.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
42. EQUATIONS FROM EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BUILD_EQUATION(A,B):
A=B
RULE EQN_01:
-
expression ontology supplies sides;
equation ontology supplies relation semantics and solving rules.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
43. INEQUALITIES FROM EXPRESSIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BUILD_INEQUALITY(A,relation,B)
RULE INEQ_01:
domain restrictions from both sides remain active.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
44. EXPRESSION REWRITING
----------------------------------------------------------------------
REWRITE_RULE R:
pattern -> replacement
with preconditions
VALID_REWRITE(R,E) iff
pattern matches
AND preconditions hold
AND semantics preserved for claimed relation type
RULE RW_01:
each rewrite step should be auditable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
45. REWRITE SYSTEM
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTITY RewriteSystem {
rules: RewriteRule*
strategy: selection_policy
}
PROPERTIES may include:
terminating
confluent
normalising
RULE RS_01:
if rewrite system terminating and confluent,
normal form is unique.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
46. PATTERN MATCHING
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MATCH(pattern,E):
compare tree structure
bind metavariables
enforce pattern constraints
RETURN substitution or failure
RULE PM_01:
commutative matching may require factor/term normalisation first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
47. TREE TRANSFORMATIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TREE_REWRITE(E,node,R):
replace matched subtree
rebuild ancestors
update domain restrictions
validate resulting expression
----------------------------------------------------------------------
48. EXPRESSION HASH / STRUCTURAL ID
----------------------------------------------------------------------
STRUCTURAL_HASH(E):
serialise canonical syntax tree
include operator identities
include variable identities
exclude superficial formatting
RULE HASH_01:
structurally equivalent canonical expressions may share hash.
RULE HASH_02:
semantic equivalence does not always imply same structural hash.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
49. PARSING AMBIGUITY
----------------------------------------------------------------------
AMBIGUITY examples:
-x^2
a/bc
implicit multiplication
nested fraction notation
function application without parentheses
RULE AMB_01:
materially ambiguous parse must be resolved before formal reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50. IMPLICIT MULTIPLICATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLES:
2x := 2*x
ab := a*b under scalar-symbol convention
3(x+1):=3*(x+1)
RULE IM_01:
implicit multiplication precedence must be explicitly standardised.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
51. SEMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RELATION HAS_TERM(AlgebraicExpression,Term)
RELATION HAS_FACTOR(Term,Factor)
RELATION HAS_VARIABLE(AlgebraicExpression,Variable)
RELATION HAS_CONSTANT(AlgebraicExpression,Constant)
RELATION HAS_OPERATOR(AlgebraicExpression,Operator)
RELATION HAS_DOMAIN_RESTRICTION(AlgebraicExpression,Constraint)
RELATION SIMPLIFIES_TO(AlgebraicExpression,AlgebraicExpression)
RELATION EXPANDS_TO(AlgebraicExpression,AlgebraicExpression)
RELATION FACTORISES_TO(AlgebraicExpression,AlgebraicExpression)
RELATION EQUIVALENT_TO(AlgebraicExpression,AlgebraicExpression)
RELATION SUBSTITUTES_IN(AlgebraicExpression,Variable)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
52. SEMANTIC EQUIVALENCE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SEMANTIC_EQUIVALENCE {
"algebraic expression" ~= symbolic_combination_of_values_variables_and_operations
"term" ~= top_level_additive_component
"factor" ~= multiplicative_component
"coefficient" ~= scalar_multiplier
"simplify" ~= transform_to_equivalent_less_complex_form
"expand" ~= distribute_products_over_sums
"factorise" ~= rewrite_sum_or_expression_as_product
"substitute" ~= replace_variable_by_value_or_expression
"evaluate" ~= compute_expression_value_under_assignment
"equivalent expressions" ~= same_value_for_all_valid_assignments_in_domain
"normal form" ~= canonical_or_strategy_selected_representation
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
53. QUERY INTERPRETATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
QUERY Q1:
"simplify E"
-> SIMPLIFY(E)
QUERY Q2:
"expand E"
-> EXPAND(E)
QUERY Q3:
"factorise E"
-> FACTORISE(E)
QUERY Q4:
"evaluate E when ..."
-> EVALUATE(E,assignment)
QUERY Q5:
"substitute ..."
-> SUBSTITUTE(E,mapping)
QUERY Q6:
"are A and B equivalent"
-> ALGEBRAIC_EQUIVALENT with domain validation
QUERY Q7:
"what is the domain"
-> EXTRACT_DOMAIN_RESTRICTIONS(E)
QUERY Q8:
"what type of expression"
-> classify expression tree and operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------
54. VALIDATION ENGINE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PROCEDURE VALIDATE_EXPRESSION(E):
parse syntax tree
check operator arities
check variable domains
check function domains
extract restrictions
verify well-formedness
return:
VALID
INVALID(reason)
AMBIGUOUS(parse_options)
PROCEDURE VALIDATE_TRANSFORMATION(A,B):
compare domain constraints
attempt symbolic derivation
compare canonical forms where applicable
optionally test representative values as supplementary evidence
return:
VALID
INVALID(counterexample_or_rule_failure)
UNRESOLVED
----------------------------------------------------------------------
55. RECURSIVE REASONING ENGINE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PROCEDURE ALGEBRAIC_EXPRESSION_REASONER(input):
parse expression syntax
resolve grouping and precedence
classify expression type
extract free variables
infer/verify domains
extract restrictions
identify requested operation
select valid rewrite rules
apply transformations atomically
update expression tree
preserve restrictions
validate intermediate states
recurse until target or normal form
validate final result
RETURN:
result,
derivation,
expression_type,
domain_restrictions,
semantic_status,
confidence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
56. RECURSIVE TRANSITION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RECURSIVE_RULE RR_01:
INPUT state S_n
identify unresolved expression structure
choose rule R such that:
pattern_matches
AND preconditions_hold
AND domain_preserved
S_(n+1):=apply(R,S_n)
validate local equivalence
recurse(S_(n+1))
TERMINATION_CONDITIONS := {
requested_form_reached,
simplification_fixed_point,
canonical_form_reached,
invalid_expression_detected,
domain_failure,
ambiguity_unresolved,
no_valid_rule
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
57. ERROR MODEL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ERROR E_MALFORMED_EXPRESSION
ERROR E_OPERATOR_ARITY
ERROR E_PRECEDENCE_AMBIGUITY
ERROR E_GROUPING_AMBIGUITY
ERROR E_DOMAIN_VIOLATION
ERROR E_DIVISION_BY_ZERO
ERROR E_INVALID_REAL_ROOT
ERROR E_INVALID_LOG_ARGUMENT
ERROR E_COMBINE_UNLIKE_TERMS
ERROR E_INVALID_CANCELLATION
ERROR E_LOST_DOMAIN_RESTRICTION
ERROR E_NON_EQUIVALENT_REWRITE
ERROR E_VARIABLE_BINDING
----------------------------------------------------------------------
58. CONFIDENCE MODEL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONFIDENCE {
base:=1.00
deduct 0.10 if implicit multiplication ambiguous
deduct 0.10 if variable domain inferred
deduct 0.15 if grouping inferred
deduct 0.15 if function semantics inferred
deduct 0.20 if symbolic equivalence unresolved
deduct 0.20 if domain restrictions incomplete
deduct 0.25 if multiple material parses remain
clamp_to_[0,1]
classification:
[0.95,1.00] -> very_high
[0.85,0.95) -> high
[0.70,0.85) -> moderate
[0.50,0.70) -> low
[0.00,0.50) -> insufficient
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
59. AI CONSUMPTION MODEL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
AI_CONSUMPTION {
read_order := [
expression_definition,
syntax_tree,
operators,
precedence,
terms_and_factors,
domain_restrictions,
simplification,
expansion,
factorisation,
substitution,
evaluation,
equivalence,
validation
]
execution_policy := {
parse_before_transform,
preserve_grouping,
preserve_variable_domains,
preserve_domain_restrictions,
distinguish_structure_from_semantics,
distinguish_identity_from_pointwise_equality,
never_cancel_without_nonzero_condition,
validate_every_rewrite,
prefer_exact_symbolic_reasoning
}
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
60. UPDATE MODEL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE_MODEL {
extensible:=true
new_operator_requires:
arity,
precedence,
associativity,
domain,
codomain
new_expression_class_requires:
structural_predicate,
domain_rules
new_rewrite_rule_requires:
pattern,
replacement,
preconditions,
equivalence_status
new_function_requires:
arity,
domain,
codomain
conflicts_require:
explicit_versioning
standard_algebraic_meaning_has_priority:=true
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
61. SELF-CHECK
----------------------------------------------------------------------
SELF_CHECK {
CHECK expression parses uniquely or ambiguity reported
CHECK operator precedence applied correctly
CHECK grouping preserved
CHECK coefficients and variables correctly typed
CHECK like-term combination valid
CHECK powers transformed only under valid laws
CHECK denominator restrictions preserved
CHECK radical/logarithm restrictions preserved
CHECK substitutions preserve grouping
CHECK rewrites preserve claimed equivalence
CHECK final result validated
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
62. COMPLETION CONDITIONS
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLETE iff {
expression_definition_defined
AND constants_defined
AND variables_defined
AND coefficients_defined
AND terms_defined
AND factors_defined
AND syntax_tree_defined
AND precedence_defined
AND domain_restrictions_defined
AND simplification_defined
AND expansion_defined
AND factorisation_defined
AND substitution_defined
AND evaluation_defined
AND equivalence_defined
AND normal_forms_defined
AND semantic_equivalence_defined
AND validation_defined
AND recursive_reasoning_defined
AND confidence_defined
AND ai_consumption_defined
AND update_model_defined
}
IF NOT COMPLETE:
semantic_status:=incomplete_flow
----------------------------------------------------------------------
63. FLOW TERMINATION
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TERMINATE WHEN:
requested algebraic-expression goal achieved
AND result validated
AND domain restrictions preserved
OR
expression is syntactically invalid
OR
domain constraints make requested operation undefined
OR
material parse ambiguity prevents valid reasoning
OR
no valid expression transformation remains
FINAL_STATE := {
expression_result,
derivation,
expression_type,
free_variables,
domain_restrictions,
semantic_status,
confidence
}
} // END FLOW AlgebraicExpressionOntology
======================================================================
END FLOW
======================================================================
FLOW STATUS:
Complete
CANONICAL PAGE:
https://kirethresearch.org/booksai-core/ontologies/mathematical-ontologies/algebra-ontologies/algebraic-expression-ontology.html
FLOW_HASH_SHA256: 95b13eea340a1a8f49430e5c87770716b4bd04eb2d6b304cc17f851d51ec6bb9
Download Code
Copy to Clipboard