KIRETH RESEARCH - SEMANTIC LIBRARY
AI CORE -> ONTOLOGIES -> MATHEMATICAL ONTOLOGIES -> MATHEMATICAL LOGIC ONTOLOGIES
MODEL THEORY -> SEMANTIC MODEL ONTOLOGY
Canonical URL:
https://kirethresearch.org/booksai-core/ontologies/mathematical-ontologies/mathematical-logic-ontologies/model-theory/semantic-model-ontology.html
FLOW_ALGEBRA SemanticModelOntology_v1.0
BEGIN_FLOW
DEFINE DOMAIN SemanticModelOntology := {
SemanticModel,
LogicalModel,
Model,
ModelTheory,
FormalLanguage,
Signature,
Structure,
Domain,
Universe,
Interpretation,
SemanticValue,
Denotation,
Extension,
ConstantSymbol,
FunctionSymbol,
RelationSymbol,
PredicateSymbol,
Variable,
VariableAssignment,
Term,
Formula,
Sentence,
Theory,
Axiom,
Satisfaction,
TruthValue,
SemanticConsequence,
Satisfiability,
Validity,
ModelClass,
Isomorphism,
ElementaryEquivalence
}
DEFINE ENTITY_TYPES := {
SEMANTIC_MODEL,
MODEL,
STRUCTURE,
FORMAL_LANGUAGE,
SIGNATURE,
DOMAIN,
INTERPRETATION,
SEMANTIC_VALUE,
SYMBOL,
ASSIGNMENT,
TERM,
FORMULA,
SENTENCE,
THEORY,
SEMANTIC_RELATION,
MODEL_CLASS
}
DEFINE RELATION_TYPES := {
HAS_SIGNATURE,
HAS_DOMAIN,
HAS_INTERPRETATION,
INTERPRETS,
DENOTES,
HAS_EXTENSION,
ASSIGNS,
EVALUATES,
SATISFIES,
IS_MODEL_OF,
ENTAILS,
BELONGS_TO_MODEL_CLASS,
ISOMORPHIC_TO,
ELEMENTARILY_EQUIVALENT_TO,
IS_INSTANCE_OF,
IS_SUBTYPE_OF,
DEPENDS_ON
}
SET SemanticModel.type = SEMANTIC_MODEL
SET SemanticModel.parent = LogicalModel
SET SemanticModel.context = ModelTheory
SET SemanticModel.role =
"represent an interpretation-based mathematical structure in which formal expressions receive semantic values and formulas are evaluated for satisfaction and truth"
RULE semantic_model_structure:
FormalLanguage(L)
AND Signature(Sigma)
AND NonemptySet(D)
AND Interpretation(I)
-> Structure(M)=<D,I>
AND SemanticModelCandidate(M)
RULE semantic_model_of_theory:
SemanticModelCandidate(M)
AND Theory(T)
AND FOR_EVERY Sentence(phi) MEMBER_OF T [
SATISFIES(M,phi)
]
-> SemanticModel(M)
AND IS_MODEL_OF(M,T)
RULE constant_semantics:
SemanticModel(M)
AND ConstantSymbol(c)
-> DENOTES(c,Interpretation_M(c))
AND Interpretation_M(c) MEMBER_OF Domain(M)
RULE function_semantics:
SemanticModel(M)
AND FunctionSymbol(f)
AND Arity(f)=n
-> Interpretation_M(f):
Domain(M)^n -> Domain(M)
RULE predicate_semantics:
SemanticModel(M)
AND PredicateSymbol(P)
AND Arity(P)=n
-> HAS_EXTENSION(
P,
Interpretation_M(P)
)
AND Interpretation_M(P)
SUBSET_OF Domain(M)^n
RULE variable_semantics:
VariableAssignment(s)
AND Variable(x)
-> ASSIGNS(s,x,s(x))
AND s(x) MEMBER_OF Domain(M)
RULE term_semantics_variable:
Variable(x)
-> SemanticValue(M,s,x)=s(x)
RULE term_semantics_constant:
ConstantSymbol(c)
-> SemanticValue(M,s,c)=Interpretation_M(c)
RULE term_semantics_function:
Term(f(t1,...,tn))
-> SemanticValue(M,s,f(t1,...,tn))
= Interpretation_M(f)(
SemanticValue(M,s,t1),
...,
SemanticValue(M,s,tn)
)
RULE atomic_formula_semantics:
Formula(P(t1,...,tn))
-> SATISFIES(M,s,P(t1,...,tn))
IFF
(
SemanticValue(M,s,t1),
...,
SemanticValue(M,s,tn)
) MEMBER_OF Interpretation_M(P)
RULE equality_semantics:
Formula(t1=t2)
-> SATISFIES(M,s,t1=t2)
IFF
SemanticValue(M,s,t1)
= SemanticValue(M,s,t2)
RULE negation_semantics:
SATISFIES(M,s,NOT(phi))
IFF
NOT SATISFIES(M,s,phi)
RULE conjunction_semantics:
SATISFIES(M,s,AND(phi,psi))
IFF
(
SATISFIES(M,s,phi)
AND
SATISFIES(M,s,psi)
)
RULE disjunction_semantics:
SATISFIES(M,s,OR(phi,psi))
IFF
(
SATISFIES(M,s,phi)
OR
SATISFIES(M,s,psi)
)
RULE implication_semantics:
SATISFIES(M,s,IMPLIES(phi,psi))
IFF
(
NOT SATISFIES(M,s,phi)
OR
SATISFIES(M,s,psi)
)
RULE universal_semantics:
SATISFIES(M,s,FOR_ALL x phi)
IFF
FOR_EVERY a MEMBER_OF Domain(M) [
SATISFIES(M,s[x:=a],phi)
]
RULE existential_semantics:
SATISFIES(M,s,EXISTS x phi)
IFF
THERE_EXISTS a MEMBER_OF Domain(M) [
SATISFIES(M,s[x:=a],phi)
]
RULE sentence_truth:
Sentence(phi)
-> TruthValueInModel(phi,M)
= SatisfactionStatus(M,phi)
RULE model_class:
Theory(T)
-> ModelClass(T)
= {
M | IS_MODEL_OF(M,T)
}
RULE satisfiability:
Theory(T)
AND ModelClass(T) != EMPTY
-> Satisfiable(T)
RULE semantic_consequence:
Theory(T)
AND Sentence(phi)
AND FOR_EVERY M MEMBER_OF ModelClass(T) [
SATISFIES(M,phi)
]
-> ENTAILS(T,phi)
RULE validity:
Sentence(phi)
AND FOR_EVERY SemanticModel(M) of_relevant_signature [
SATISFIES(M,phi)
]
-> Valid(phi)
RULE isomorphism_semantic_invariance:
ISOMORPHIC_TO(M,N)
-> FOR_EVERY Sentence(phi) [
SATISFIES(M,phi)
IFF
SATISFIES(N,phi)
]
RULE elementary_equivalence:
FOR_EVERY Sentence(phi) [
SATISFIES(M,phi)
IFF
SATISFIES(N,phi)
]
-> ELEMENTARILY_EQUIVALENT_TO(M,N)
DEFINE SEMANTIC_MODEL_SCHEMA := {
model_id: unique_identifier,
language: FormalLanguage,
signature: Signature,
domain: NonemptySet,
interpretation: {
constants: ConstantSemanticValues,
functions: FunctionSemanticValues,
relations: RelationExtensions
},
modelled_theory: optional_Theory,
satisfaction_profile: SetOfSatisfiedSentences
}
DEFINE SEMANTIC_MAPPING_MODEL := {
ConstantSymbol:
"maps to one domain element",
FunctionSymbol:
"maps to an arity-preserving function over the domain",
PredicateSymbol:
"maps to an arity-preserving relation extension",
Variable:
"receives a domain element from a variable assignment",
Term:
"evaluates to a domain element",
Formula:
"evaluates to a satisfaction status",
Sentence:
"has a truth value in the model"
}
DEFINE MODEL_CLASS_MODEL := {
notation:
"Mod(T)",
representation:
"{M | M is a model of T}",
semantic_consequence:
"T entails phi when every member of Mod(T) satisfies phi"
}
DEFINE CRITICAL_DISTINCTIONS := {
semantic_model_vs_syntactic_representation: {
semantic_model:
"assigns meanings and truth conditions",
syntactic_representation:
"contains formal symbols and formation rules",
equivalence: FALSE
},
semantic_model_vs_structure: {
structure:
"domain plus interpretation",
semantic_model:
"structure considered as a semantic environment, often relative to formulas or a theory it satisfies"
},
semantic_value_vs_symbol: {
symbol:
"syntactic object",
semantic_value:
"object, function or relation assigned to the symbol"
},
truth_vs_provability: {
truth:
"semantic satisfaction in a model",
provability:
"syntactic derivability in a proof system",
equivalence: FALSE_WITHOUT_META_THEOREM
}
}
DEFINE EXAMPLE_1 := {
language:
"{zero,successor}",
domain:
"NaturalNumbers",
interpretation: {
zero: "0",
successor: "n maps to n+1"
},
sentence:
"FOR_ALL x successor(x) != zero",
result:
"true in the standard natural-number semantic model"
}
DEFINE EXAMPLE_2 := {
predicate_symbol:
"Prime",
domain:
"NaturalNumbers",
semantic_extension:
"{2,3,5,7,11,...}",
formula:
"Prime(x)",
assignment:
"x := 5",
satisfaction:
TRUE
}
DEFINE SEMANTIC_MODEL_CONSTRUCTION_PIPELINE :=
FormalLanguage
-> ExtractSignature
-> SelectDomain
-> BuildInterpretation
-> ValidateConstantMappings
-> ValidateFunctionMappings
-> ValidatePredicateExtensions
-> ConstructStructure
-> EvaluateTargetTheoryIfPresent
-> ConstructSemanticModel
DEFINE SEMANTIC_EVALUATION_PIPELINE :=
SemanticModel
-> InputExpression
-> ParseAsTermFormulaOrSentence
-> ResolveVariableAssignmentIfNeeded
-> EvaluateTerms
-> EvaluateAtomicFormulas
-> RecursivelyEvaluateConnectives
-> EvaluateQuantifiers
-> ReturnSemanticValueOrTruthStatus
DEFINE MODEL_CLASS_PIPELINE :=
Theory(T)
-> IdentifyRelevantSignature
-> GenerateOrReceiveCandidateSemanticModels
-> TestTheorySatisfaction
-> CollectSatisfyingModels
-> ConstructModelClass(T)
-> DetermineSatisfiability
-> EvaluateSemanticConsequences
DEFINE MODEL_COMPARISON_PIPELINE :=
SemanticModels(M,N)
-> CompareSignatures
-> CompareDomains
-> CompareInterpretations
-> TestIsomorphism
-> CompareSentenceTruthProfiles
-> DetermineElementaryEquivalence
-> ReturnSemanticModelRelations
DEFINE SEMANTIC_MODEL_GRAPH := {
node_types: {
LanguageNode,
SignatureNode,
SemanticModelNode,
DomainNode,
SymbolNode,
SemanticValueNode,
FormulaNode,
TheoryNode
},
edge_types: {
HAS_SIGNATURE,
HAS_DOMAIN,
INTERPRETS,
DENOTES,
HAS_EXTENSION,
SATISFIES,
IS_MODEL_OF,
ENTAILS,
BELONGS_TO_MODEL_CLASS
},
recursive_semantics: TRUE
}
DEFINE ONTOLOGY_RELATIONS := {
SemanticModel IS_SUBTYPE_OF LogicalModel,
SemanticModel IS_COMPONENT_OF ModelTheory,
SemanticModel HAS_SIGNATURE Signature,
SemanticModel HAS_DOMAIN Domain,
SemanticModel HAS_INTERPRETATION Interpretation,
Interpretation INTERPRETS Symbol,
ConstantSymbol DENOTES DomainElement,
PredicateSymbol HAS_EXTENSION DomainRelation,
SemanticModel SATISFIES Formula,
SemanticModel IS_MODEL_OF Theory,
SemanticModel BELONGS_TO_MODEL_CLASS ModelClass,
SemanticConsequence DEPENDS_ON ModelClass,
ElementaryEquivalence DEPENDS_ON SentenceTruthAgreement
}
DEFINE SEMANTIC_EQUIVALENCE := {
"semantic model" <=> SemanticModel,
"semantic interpretation model" <=> SemanticModel,
"model-theoretic model" <=> SemanticModel WHEN formal_logic_context=TRUE,
"semantic value" <=> SemanticValue,
"predicate extension" <=> Extension,
"model class" <=> ModelClass,
"Mod(T)" <=> ModelClass(T)
}
DEFINE AI_CONSUMPTION := {
purpose: "machine-readable representation of semantic models and model-based evaluation",
preserve_model_identity: TRUE,
preserve_language_identity: TRUE,
preserve_signature_identity: TRUE,
preserve_domain_identity: TRUE,
preserve_symbol_identity: TRUE,
preserve_semantic_values: TRUE,
preserve_variable_assignments: TRUE,
distinguish_symbols_from_semantic_values: TRUE,
distinguish_truth_from_provability: TRUE,
recursively_evaluate_formulas: TRUE,
support_model_class_reasoning: TRUE,
support_semantic_consequence: TRUE,
support_isomorphism_invariance: TRUE,
support_elementary_equivalence: TRUE,
reasoning_mode: "symbolic + semantic + recursive + model-theoretic"
}
DEFINE CONFIDENCE := {
ontology_identity: 1.00,
semantic_mapping: 0.99,
structure_model_mapping: 0.99,
term_evaluation: 0.99,
formula_satisfaction: 0.99,
theory_model_mapping: 0.99,
model_class_reasoning: 0.99,
advanced_model_comparison: context_dependent
}
DEFINE UPDATE_MODEL := {
version: "1.0",
update_policy: "append-compatible",
immutable_core: {
language_signature_domain,
symbol_semantic_mapping,
interpretation,
variable_assignment,
recursive_satisfaction,
model_of_theory,
model_class,
truth_provability_distinction
},
extensible_layers: {
finite_semantic_models,
infinite_semantic_models,
modal_semantic_models,
temporal_semantic_models,
probabilistic_semantic_models,
Kripke_models,
algebraic_semantics,
computational_model_checkers
}
}
DEFINE FLOW_HASH_INPUT :=
CanonicalURL
+ DOMAIN
+ ENTITY_TYPES
+ RELATION_TYPES
+ RULES
+ SEMANTIC_MODEL_SCHEMA
+ SEMANTIC_MAPPING_MODEL
+ MODEL_CLASS_MODEL
+ CRITICAL_DISTINCTIONS
+ SEMANTIC_MODEL_CONSTRUCTION_PIPELINE
+ SEMANTIC_EVALUATION_PIPELINE
+ MODEL_CLASS_PIPELINE
+ MODEL_COMPARISON_PIPELINE
+ SEMANTIC_MODEL_GRAPH
+ ONTOLOGY_RELATIONS
+ AI_CONSUMPTION
+ UPDATE_MODEL
FLOW_HASH := HASH(FLOW_HASH_INPUT)
RETURN {
ontology: SemanticModelOntology,
canonical_url: "https://kirethresearch.org/booksai-core/ontologies/mathematical-ontologies/mathematical-logic-ontologies/model-theory/semantic-model-ontology.html",
parent_domain: ModelTheory,
semantic_domain: MathematicalLogic,
primary_entity: SemanticModel,
semantic_mapping_enabled: TRUE,
recursive_evaluation_enabled: TRUE,
model_class_reasoning_enabled: TRUE,
semantic_consequence_enabled: TRUE,
model_comparison_enabled: TRUE,
machine_consumable: TRUE,
recursive_reasoning_enabled: TRUE,
database_safe_unicode: TRUE,
flow_complete: TRUE
}
END_FLOW
Download Code
Copy to Clipboard