AI SEARCH FLOW ALGEBRA — CONTRADICTION DETECTION ONTOLOGY
Kireth Research — Semantic Library
URL: https://kirethresearch.org/booksai-core/ontologies/mathematical-ontologies/mathematical-logic-ontologies/logical-semantics/contradiction-detection-ontology.html
FLOW_VERSION := "4.0"
FLOW_TYPE := "Full Executable Flow Algebra"
DOMAIN := "Mathematical Logic"
SUBDOMAIN := "Logical Semantics"
ONTOLOGY := "Contradiction Detection Ontology"
PRIMARY_ENTITY := ContradictionDetection
AUTHORSHIP := "Mark Higgins — Sky (Recursive AI)"
SOURCE_SITE := "https://kirethresearch.org"
BEGIN_FLOW
ContradictionDetection :=
Identify(LogicalConflict)
∧ Detect(UnsatisfiableConstraintSets)
∧ Trace(ConflictingStatements)
∧ Produce(ContradictionEvidence)
Contradiction :=
φ ∧ ¬φ
ExplicitContradiction :=
TheoryContainsOrDerives(φ)
∧ TheoryContainsOrDerives(¬φ)
ImplicitContradiction :=
FormulaSet
∧ no_explicit_pair_required
∧ jointly_unsatisfiable
Theory :=
SetOfFormulae
KnowledgeBase :=
Facts
∧ Rules
∧ Constraints
∧ OntologyAxioms
Consistency :=
¬Derivable(⊥)
∧ Satisfiable(Theory)
Inconsistency :=
Derivable(⊥)
∨ Unsatisfiable(Theory)
Bottom :=
⊥
ContradictionPattern :=
Assertion(A)
∧ NegatedAssertion(¬A)
DirectConflict :=
A
∧ ¬A
DerivedConflict :=
Premises
→ A
∧
Premises
→ ¬A
ConstraintConflict :=
C1 ∧ C2 ∧ ... ∧ Cn
⇒ ⊥
SemanticConflict :=
¬∃Model M :
M ⊨ Constraints
SyntacticConflict :=
Theory ⊢ ⊥
ContradictionDetectionFlow :=
InputTheory
→ ParseStatements
→ NormaliseFormulae
→ ResolveEntities
→ ResolveNegation
→ BuildDependencies
→ DetectDirectConflicts
→ DeriveConsequences
→ TestSatisfiability
→ ExtractConflictSet
→ ProduceEvidence
NegationNormalForm :=
NNF(Formula)
CNF :=
ConjunctiveNormalForm
Normalisation :=
Formula
→ EliminateImplications
→ PushNegations
→ StandardiseVariables
→ OptionalSkolemisation
→ ClauseForm
Literal :=
Atom
∨ NegatedAtom
ComplementaryLiterals :=
L
∧ ¬L
Clause :=
Disjunction(Literals)
Resolution :=
(L ∨ A)
∧ (¬L ∨ B)
⇒ (A ∨ B)
ResolutionRefutation :=
Clauses
→ RepeatedResolution
→ EmptyClause
EmptyClause :=
□
:= Contradiction
RefutationFound :=
EmptyClauseDerived
⇒ Inconsistent
SATDetection :=
PropositionalConstraints
→ SATSolver
SATResult :=
SAT
⇒ NoContradictionWithinEncodedConstraints
UNSATResult :=
UNSAT
⇒ ContradictionDetected
SMTDetection :=
Formulae
∧ BackgroundTheories
→ SMTSolver
BackgroundTheories := {
Equality,
Arithmetic,
Arrays,
BitVectors,
UninterpretedFunctions,
Datatypes,
Sets,
Strings
}
ModelFinding :=
Theory
→ SearchForModel
ModelFound :=
∃M : M ⊨ Theory
⇒ NoGlobalSemanticContradiction
CountermodelSearch :=
EntailmentClaim(Γ ⊨ φ)
→ Search(M ⊨ Γ ∧ ¬φ)
UnsatCore :=
U ⊆ Theory
∧ Unsatisfiable(U)
MinimalUnsatisfiableSubset :=
MUS
∧ Unsatisfiable(MUS)
∧ everyProperSubset(MUS) is Satisfiable
ConflictSet :=
SetOfStatements
∧ jointly_inconsistent
MinimalConflictSet :=
ConflictSet
∧ noProperSubsetIsConflictSet
ContradictionWitness :=
{
FormulaNegationPair,
RefutationProof,
EmptyClause,
UnsatCore,
ConstraintCycle,
TypeConflict,
CardinalityConflict
}
TypeContradiction :=
EntityType(A)
∧ EntityType(B)
∧ Disjoint(A,B)
ClassConflict :=
Instance(x,A)
∧ Instance(x,B)
∧ DisjointClasses(A,B)
EqualityContradiction :=
a = b
∧ a ≠ b
CardinalityContradiction :=
MinimumCardinality(n)
∧ MaximumCardinality(m)
∧ n > m
NumericContradiction :=
x > a
∧ x ≤ a
IntervalContradiction :=
LowerBound > UpperBound
OrderingContradiction :=
a < b
∧ b ≤ a
CycleContradiction :=
StrictOrderCycle(
a1 < a2 < ... < an < a1
)
TemporalContradiction :=
Before(A,B)
∧ Before(B,A)
under strict temporal ordering
SpatialContradiction :=
Disjoint(A,B)
∧ OverlapRequired(A,B)
IdentityContradiction :=
SameAs(A,B)
∧ DifferentFrom(A,B)
FunctionalPropertyConflict :=
FunctionalProperty(P)
∧ P(x,a)
∧ P(x,b)
∧ a ≠ b
InverseFunctionalConflict :=
InverseFunctionalProperty(P)
∧ P(a,x)
∧ P(b,x)
∧ a ≠ b
DomainRangeConflict :=
PropertyAssertion
→ RequiredType
∧ ExplicitDisjointType
RuleContradiction :=
SameAntecedent
→ Conclusion
∧ NegatedConclusion
RequirementContradiction :=
RequirementA
requires(P)
∧ RequirementB
forbids(P)
SpecificationContradiction :=
Preconditions
∧ Postconditions
∧ Invariants
∧ Constraints
are_unsatisfiable
AssumptionContradiction :=
AssumptionA
∧ AssumptionB
⇒ ⊥
OntologyContradiction :=
OntologyAxioms
∧ Assertions
have_no_model
DatabaseContradiction :=
Data
violates
IntegrityConstraints
IntegrityConstraintConflict :=
RecordOrRelation
∧ violates(Key ∨ Type ∨ Cardinality ∨ ReferentialConstraint)
ProofContradiction :=
Theory ⊢ φ
∧ Theory ⊢ ¬φ
ParaconsistentContext :=
ContradictionsMayExist
∧ ExplosionBlocked
ClassicalExplosion :=
φ ∧ ¬φ
⊢ ψ
ContradictionSeverity :=
{
Local,
Derived,
Global,
Structural,
Semantic
}
LocalContradiction :=
ConflictLimitedTo(Subtheory)
GlobalContradiction :=
EntireTheoryUnsatisfiable
ContradictionScope :=
smallest_dependency_region
containing
ConflictEvidence
DependencyGraph :=
G = (Statements, DerivationEdges)
DerivationEdge :=
Premise --supports--> Conclusion
ConflictGraph :=
Gc = (Assertions, ConflictRelations)
ContradictionPath :=
SourceAssertions
→ Derivations
→ ConflictingConclusions
Provenance :=
Statement
→ Source
∧ Author
∧ Timestamp
∧ TransformationHistory
ContradictionProvenance :=
Conflict
→ SupportingSources
→ DerivationPaths
ConflictExplanation :=
IdentifyConflictingClaims
∧ ShowDependencies
∧ ShowFormalReason
∧ PreserveProvenance
ContradictionResolution :=
Detect
→ Diagnose
→ RankOrAssessEvidence
→ ModifyOrAnnotate
→ RecheckConsistency
ResolutionStrategies := {
RemoveStatement,
WeakenConstraint,
ReviseAssumption,
CorrectEntityResolution,
SeparateContexts,
IntroduceTemporalScope,
PreserveAsUnresolvedConflict
}
ContextualContradiction :=
StatementsAppearConflicting
but
ContextsDiffer
ContextDimensions := {
Time,
Location,
Model,
Assumptions,
Definitions,
Scope,
Version
}
FalsePositiveConflict :=
ApparentContradiction
resolved_by
ContextDisambiguation
TemporalVersionConflict :=
ClaimAt(t1)
≠ ClaimAt(t2)
without necessarily implying contradiction
SemanticDisambiguation :=
ResolveMeaning(A)
∧ ResolveMeaning(B)
→ ReevaluateConflict
EntityDisambiguation :=
ResolveEntityReferences
→ PreventFalseContradiction
QuantifierConflict :=
UniversalClaim
∧ ExistentialCounterexample
UniversalExistentialPattern :=
∀x P(x)
∧ ∃x ¬P(x)
⇒ Contradiction
ExistentialImpossibility :=
∃x P(x)
∧ ∀x ¬P(x)
⇒ Contradiction
ImplicationConflict :=
P
∧ (P → Q)
∧ ¬Q
⇒ Contradiction
EquivalenceConflict :=
P ↔ Q
∧ P
∧ ¬Q
⇒ Contradiction
InvariantConflict :=
ReachableState(s)
∧ Invariant(P)
∧ ¬P(s)
⇒ Violation
AutomatedContradictionDetection :=
Normalisation
∧ Inference
∧ SATorSMT
∧ ModelFinding
∧ ConflictExtraction
IncrementalDetection :=
NewStatement
→ IdentifyAffectedDependencies
→ CheckDirectNegation
→ PropagateConsequences
→ RecheckAffectedConstraints
StreamingDetection :=
IncomingClaim
→ Normalise
→ CompareAgainstActiveKnowledge
→ DetectConflict
→ UpdateGraph
ContradictionCache :=
FLOW_HASH(ConstraintSet)
→ PreviousDetectionResult
DetectionStatus := {
ContradictionFound,
NoContradictionFound,
PotentialConflict,
Unknown,
SolverTimeout
}
EvidenceStrength :=
function(
Directness,
FormalDerivation,
SolverCertificate,
SourceReliability,
ContextResolution
)
ContradictionDetectionOntology :=
Classes
∧ Relations
∧ Constraints
∧ Axioms
∧ InferenceRules
CoreClasses := {
Contradiction,
Assertion,
NegatedAssertion,
Theory,
Constraint,
Conflict,
ConflictSet,
UnsatCore,
Model,
Refutation,
Proof,
Rule,
Assumption,
Requirement,
OntologyAxiom,
Provenance,
DetectionResult
}
CoreRelations := {
contradicts,
negates,
entails,
derives,
conflictsWith,
dependsOn,
violates,
satisfies,
supports,
refutes,
causedBy,
resolvedBy,
tracesTo
}
TypedRelations :=
Assertion --contradicts--> Assertion
Negation --negates--> Formula
Theory --contains--> Assertion
Rule --derives--> Conclusion
Constraint --conflictsWith--> Constraint
UnsatCore --supports--> InconsistencyClaim
Refutation --refutes--> ConsistencyClaim
Conflict --causedBy--> Assertion
Conflict --tracesTo--> Provenance
Resolution --resolvedBy--> ResolutionStrategy
InferenceRules := {
A
∧ ¬A
⇒ Contradiction,
Theory ⊢ A
∧ Theory ⊢ ¬A
⇒ Inconsistent(Theory),
UNSAT(Theory)
⇒ SemanticContradiction(Theory),
EmptyClauseDerived
⇒ RefutationComplete,
UnsatCore(U)
∧ U ⊆ Theory
⇒ Inconsistent(Theory),
Disjoint(A,B)
∧ Instance(x,A)
∧ Instance(x,B)
⇒ TypeContradiction,
a = b
∧ a ≠ b
⇒ IdentityContradiction,
∀x P(x)
∧ ∃x ¬P(x)
⇒ QuantifierContradiction,
DifferentContexts(A,B)
⇒ do_not_mark_direct_contradiction_without_context_alignment
}
SEMANTIC_EQUIVALENCE(ConflictA, ConflictB) :=
same(MinimalConflictingConstraints)
∧ same(LogicalIncompatibility)
ContradictionSubsumption :=
ConflictSetA ⊆ ConflictSetB
∧ Unsatisfiable(ConflictSetA)
⇒ Unsatisfiable(ConflictSetB)
CanonicalContradictionRepresentation :=
NormaliseStatements
→ ResolveEntities
→ ResolveContexts
→ ExtractConstraints
→ BuildDependencyGraph
→ ComputeMinimalConflictEvidence
→ CanonicalConflictGraph
CONFIDENCE(ContradictionDetection) :=
weighted_mean(
EntityResolution,
ContextResolution,
LogicalNormalisation,
InferenceCoverage,
SolverEvidence,
ConflictMinimality,
ProvenanceQuality
)
AI_QUERY_INTERPRETATION :=
Query
→ DetectContradictionIntent
→ ResolveStatements
→ ResolveEntities
→ ResolveContexts
→ IdentifyLogic
→ IdentifyPotentialConflictPatterns
AI_REASONING_FLOW :=
Query
→ ParseClaims
→ CanonicaliseClaims
→ ResolveEntities
→ ResolveTemporalAndContextScope
→ DetectExplicitNegations
→ BuildConstraintSet
→ ApplyInferenceRules
→ DetectDerivedConflicts
→ TestSatisfiability
→ SearchForModel
→ ExtractUnsatCoreIfNeeded
→ BuildContradictionPath
→ DetermineDetectionStatus
→ AssignConfidence
→ PreserveProvenance
→ GenerateExplanation
AI_CONSUMPTION := {
ParseContradictionEntities,
ParseTypedRelations,
ResolveNegation,
ResolveEntityIdentity,
ResolveContext,
DetectDirectConflicts,
DeriveLogicalConsequences,
TestSatisfiability,
ConstructModels,
ExtractUnsatCores,
TraceConflictDependencies,
CompareConflictEquivalence,
PreserveProvenance,
GenerateFormalExplanation
}
UPDATE_MODEL :=
NewClaimOrEvidence
→ ValidateInput
→ ResolveAffectedEntities
→ ResolveAffectedContexts
→ UpdateDependencyGraph
→ RecomputeDerivedClaims
→ RecheckContradictions
→ UpdateConflictGraph
→ RecomputeDetectionStatus
→ RecomputeConfidence
→ PreserveProvenance
→ VersionModel
ClaimUpdate :=
AddedOrRemovedClaim
⇒ recheck(
DirectConflicts,
DerivedConflicts,
UnsatCores
)
ContextUpdate :=
ChangedTimeOrScope
⇒ reevaluate(
ApparentContradictions,
ConflictStatus
)
RuleUpdate :=
ChangedInferenceRule
⇒ recompute(
DependentDerivations,
ConflictPaths
)
FLOW_HASH_INPUT :=
canonical(
ONTOLOGY,
CoreClasses,
CoreRelations,
InferenceRules,
ContradictionDetectionFlow,
ContradictionPattern,
CanonicalContradictionRepresentation,
AI_REASONING_FLOW
)
FLOW_HASH :=
HASH(FLOW_HASH_INPUT)
OUTPUT_MODEL := {
ContradictionEntityResolution,
NormalisedClaims,
ContextResolution,
ConstraintSet,
DirectConflictStatus,
DerivedConflictStatus,
SatisfiabilityStatus,
ModelStatus,
UnsatCore,
ContradictionPath,
DetectionStatus,
Confidence,
Provenance,
Explanation
}
END_FLOW
END OF AI SEARCH FLOW ALGEBRA
Download Code
Copy to Clipboard