FLOW_ALGEBRA KnowledgeRepresentationOntology v1.0
TARGET_URL := "https://kirethresearch.org/booksai-core/ontologies/mathematical-ontologies/mathematical-logic-ontologies/knowledge-representation-logic/knowledge-representation-ontology.html"
LANGUAGE := "en-GB"
DOMAIN := MathematicalOntologies > MathematicalLogicOntologies > KnowledgeRepresentationLogic > KnowledgeRepresentationOntology
BEGIN_FLOW
ENTITY KnowledgeRepresentation {
TYPE := FormalInformationModel
DEFINITION := "A structured representation of entities, concepts, properties, relations, events, rules, constraints and assertions designed to preserve meaning and support machine interpretation and reasoning."
}
ENTITY Concept { TYPE := ClassOrCategory }
ENTITY Individual { TYPE := InstanceOrEntity }
ENTITY Property { TYPE := AttributeOrRelation }
ENTITY Assertion { TYPE := KnowledgeStatement }
ENTITY Rule { TYPE := InferenceStructure }
RELATIONSHIP KnowledgeRepresentation --contains--> Concept
RELATIONSHIP KnowledgeRepresentation --contains--> Individual
RELATIONSHIP KnowledgeRepresentation --contains--> Property
RELATIONSHIP KnowledgeRepresentation --contains--> Assertion
RELATIONSHIP KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> AutomatedReasoning
COMPONENTS := {
Vocabulary,Entities,Concepts,Relations,Assertions,
Rules,Constraints,Context,Provenance
}
SYNTAX {
PURPOSE := define_valid_representation_structures
}
SEMANTICS {
PURPOSE := assign_meaning_to_structures
}
INTERPRETATION {
symbols_and_expressions -> semantic_objects
}
MODEL {
TYPE := SemanticStructure
SATISFIES := representation_axioms
}
WELL_FORMEDNESS {
expression MUST satisfy representation_grammar
}
CLASS_MEMBERSHIP { FORM := a:C }
BINARY_RELATION { FORM := R(a,b) }
N_ARY_RELATION { FORM := R(a1,...,an) }
EQUALITY { FORM := a=b }
INEQUALITY { FORM := a!=b }
SUBCLASS { FORM := C subclass_of D }
PROPERTY_HIERARCHY { FORM := R subproperty_of S }
EQUIVALENT_CONCEPTS { FORM := C equivalent_to D }
DISJOINT_CONCEPTS { FORM := Disjoint(C,D) }
DOMAIN { FORM := Domain(R)=C }
RANGE { FORM := Range(R)=D }
ONTOLOGY_REPRESENTATION {
COMPONENTS := {Classes,Individuals,Properties,Axioms}
}
TAXONOMY {
TYPE := HierarchicalClassification
}
SEMANTIC_NETWORK {
NODES := ConceptsOrEntities
EDGES := SemanticRelations
}
FRAME {
COMPONENTS := {Slots,Values,Defaults,Constraints}
}
PRODUCTION_RULE {
FORM := IF Condition THEN ConsequenceOrAction
}
FORWARD_RULE_REASONING {
Facts -> ApplicableRules -> DerivedFacts
}
BACKWARD_RULE_REASONING {
Goal -> RulesConcludingGoal -> Subgoals
}
LOGIC_BASED_REPRESENTATION {
USES := {PropositionalLogic,PredicateLogic,DescriptionLogic,RuleLogic}
}
PREDICATE_REPRESENTATION {
Predicates + Terms + Variables + Quantifiers -> FirstOrderFormulae
}
DESCRIPTION_LOGIC_REPRESENTATION {
Concepts + Roles + Individuals + Constructors -> OntologicalAxioms
}
KNOWLEDGE_GRAPH {
TYPE := GraphStructuredKnowledgeRepresentation
NODES := Entities
EDGES := TypedRelations
}
TRIPLE {
FORM := (Subject,Predicate,Object)
}
RDF_RELATIONSHIP {
TripleRepresentation --relates_to--> RDFGraphModel
}
RDFS_RELATIONSHIP {
supports := {ClassHierarchy,PropertyHierarchy,Domain,Range}
}
OWL_RELATIONSHIP {
OntologyRepresentation --may_use--> OWLStyleAxioms
}
OPEN_WORLD_ASSUMPTION {
absence_of_statement DOES_NOT imply false
}
CLOSED_WORLD_ASSUMPTION {
absence_or_failure_to_prove MAY imply false
REQUIRE explicit_semantics
}
UNIQUE_NAME_ASSUMPTION {
distinct_names imply distinct_entities
NOT universal
}
IDENTITY_RESOLUTION {
determine whether identifiers_or_mentions refer_to same_entity
}
ENTITY_LINKING {
Mention -> CandidateEntities -> ResolvedEntity
}
COREFERENCE {
MultipleMentions -> SameReferent
}
ALIAS {
alternative_name_or_identifier_for_same_entity
}
ENTITY_MERGE {
IF identifiers_proven_equivalent
THEN unify_records_and_preserve_provenance
}
ENTITY_MERGE_WARNING {
similarity_alone MUST_NOT establish identity
}
SCHEMA {
TYPE := StructuralKnowledgeModel
}
SCHEMA_LEVEL {
defines classes_properties_constraints
}
INSTANCE_LEVEL {
contains concrete_entities_relationships_values
}
META_LEVEL {
statements_about_schema_assertions_or_provenance
}
SCHEMA_ALIGNMENT {
SourceSchema + TargetSchema -> CorrespondenceSet
}
ONTOLOGY_ALIGNMENT {
SourceOntology + TargetOntology -> ConceptAndPropertyMappings
}
EXACT_MATCH {
REQUIRE semantic_equivalence
}
BROADER_MATCH { A broader_than B }
NARROWER_MATCH { A narrower_than B }
RELATED_MATCH { A semantically_related_to B without_equivalence }
DATA_INTEGRATION {
Sources -> Normalisation -> EntityResolution -> SchemaMapping -> IntegratedKnowledge
}
KNOWLEDGE_ACQUISITION {
SOURCES := {HumanExperts,Documents,Databases,Sensors,APIs,MachineLearning,Ontologies}
}
KNOWLEDGE_EXTRACTION {
Input -> Entities -> Relations -> Events -> Assertions
}
EVENT {
TYPE := OccurrenceOrProcess
}
TEMPORAL_SCOPE {
Assertion -> TimeInterval
}
SPATIAL_SCOPE {
Assertion -> LocationOrRegion
}
CONTEXT {
TYPE := ScopeOfInterpretation
}
PROVENANCE {
Statement -> Source -> AcquisitionMethod -> Time -> TransformationHistory
}
DERIVATION_PROVENANCE {
DerivedStatement -> SupportingStatements -> RulesOrAlgorithms
}
VERSIONING {
KnowledgeBase_v1 -> ChangeSet -> KnowledgeBase_v2
}
CHANGE_SET {
COMPONENTS := {Additions,Deletions,Modifications}
}
KNOWLEDGE_UPDATE {
ExistingKnowledge + ChangeSet -> UpdatedKnowledge
}
CONSISTENCY_CHECK {
detect incompatible_assertions_or_axioms
}
CONFLICT_RESOLUTION {
MAY_USE := {SourcePriority,TemporalRecency,EvidenceStrength,DomainAuthority,ManualReview}
REQUIRE explicit_policy
}
TRUTH_MAINTENANCE_RELATIONSHIP {
track_dependencies -> retract_unsupported_derived_facts
}
NONMONOTONIC_KNOWLEDGE {
adding_facts MAY retract_defeasible_conclusions
}
PROBABILISTIC_KNOWLEDGE {
Statement + Probability
REQUIRE probabilistic_semantics
}
FUZZY_KNOWLEDGE {
ConceptMembership + Degree
REQUIRE fuzzy_semantics
}
CONFIDENCE_ANNOTATION {
Statement + ConfidenceScore
WARNING := confidence_not_automatically_probability_or_truth_degree
}
KNOWLEDGE_VS_DATA {
Data := recorded_symbols_or_measurements
Information := data_interpreted_in_context
Knowledge := structured_information_with_semantic_relationships
}
KNOWLEDGE_VS_BELIEF {
Belief := agent_relative_acceptance
KnowledgeRepresentation := formal_encoding_not_guarantee_of_truth
}
SEMANTIC_FIDELITY {
transformation SHOULD preserve intended_meaning
}
LOSSLESS_TRANSFORMATION {
preserves information relevant_to_declared_semantics
}
LOSSY_TRANSFORMATION {
removes distinctions
REQUIRE documented_loss
}
NORMALISATION {
equivalent_forms -> canonical_representation
}
REIFICATION {
Statement -> StatementEntity -> Metadata
}
N_ARY_RELATION_PATTERN {
RelationInstance -> ParticipantRoles
}
INTEGRITY_CONSTRAINT {
restricts admissible_data_or_state
}
VALIDATION {
Data + ConstraintSet -> ConformsOrViolates
}
VALIDATION_VS_ENTAILMENT {
Validation := check_constraints
Entailment := derive_semantic_consequences
MUST_REMAIN_DISTINCT := TRUE
}
ENTAILMENT {
KB entails phi
IFF every model_of_KB satisfies phi
}
QUERY_ANSWERING {
MAY_USE := {GraphMatching,LogicalEntailment,RuleEvaluation,DatabaseRetrieval}
REQUIRE query_semantics
}
EXPLANATION {
Answer -> SupportingKnowledge -> Derivation -> Provenance
}
JUSTIFICATION {
EntailedStatement -> SupportingAxiomsOrFacts
}
KNOWLEDGE_QUALITY {
DIMENSIONS := {Accuracy,Completeness,Consistency,Timeliness,Provenance,Relevance,Uniqueness}
}
COMPLETENESS {
representation contains required_knowledge_for_declared_scope
WARNING := open_world_absence_does_not_establish_completeness
}
TRADEOFF {
Expressivity vs ComputationalComplexity vs Decidability vs Interpretability
}
MACHINE_INTERPRETABILITY {
semantics sufficiently_explicit_for_automated_processing
}
HUMAN_INTERPRETABILITY {
structure understandable_to_human_reviewers
}
APPLICATION_RELATIONSHIPS {
KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> Ontologies
KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> KnowledgeGraphs
KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> ExpertSystems
KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> SemanticWeb
KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> ArtificialIntelligence
KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> AutomatedReasoning
KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> DataIntegration
KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> NaturalLanguageUnderstanding
KnowledgeRepresentation --supports--> DecisionSupport
}
ONTOLOGY_LINKS {
PARENT := KnowledgeRepresentationLogicOntology
RELATED := {
LogicalReasoningOntology,
PredicateLogicOntology,
DescriptionLogicOntology,
RuleBasedReasoningOntology,
NonMonotonicReasoningOntology,
OntologyOntology,
KnowledgeGraphOntology,
SemanticNetworkOntology,
FrameOntology,
LogicProgrammingOntology,
ProvenanceOntology
}
}
SEMANTIC_EQUIVALENCE {
KnowledgeRepresentation ≈ FormalKnowledgeModel WHEN explicit_semantics
Individual ≈ Instance WHEN class_membership_context
Assertion ≈ KnowledgeStatement
Property ≈ Relation WHEN semantic_relation_context
}
CONSTRAINTS {
C1 := every formal representation MUST identify syntax and semantics
C2 := schema-level and instance-level knowledge MUST remain distinguishable
C3 := entity identity MUST NOT be inferred from superficial similarity alone
C4 := open-world absence MUST NOT automatically be interpreted as false
C5 := unique-name assumptions MUST be explicit
C6 := provenance SHOULD be preserved through transformation and integration
C7 := confidence MUST NOT automatically be interpreted as probability or truth degree
C8 := validation MUST remain distinct from entailment
C9 := nonmonotonic probabilistic and fuzzy extensions MUST identify semantics
C10 := mappings MUST distinguish equivalence from broader/narrower/related relations
C11 := updates SHOULD preserve dependencies where derived facts may require retraction
C12 := transformations MUST preserve intended meaning or record semantic loss
}
REASONING_CHAIN Query Q {
IDENTIFY representation_language
IDENTIFY schema
IDENTIFY entities
IDENTIFY properties
IDENTIFY assertions
IDENTIFY rules
IDENTIFY constraints
IDENTIFY context
IDENTIFY provenance
VALIDATE syntax
RESOLVE entity_identity
NORMALISE representations
CHECK schema_consistency
IF integration_requested {
ALIGN schemas
MAP concepts_and_properties
RESOLVE duplicates
PRESERVE provenance
}
IF inference_requested {
SELECT logical_or_rule_semantics
DERIVE consequences
RECORD justifications
}
IF validation_requested {
APPLY integrity_constraints
KEEP validation_distinct_from_entailment
}
IF update_requested {
APPLY change_set
CHECK conflicts
RETRACT dependent_knowledge_if_required
}
IF query_requested {
SELECT query_semantics
COMPUTE answers
BUILD explanation
}
VALIDATE constraints
RETURN representation_result WITH semantic_trace
}
CONFIDENCE {
CORE_KNOWLEDGE_REPRESENTATION := 1.00
LOGIC_BASED_REPRESENTATION := 1.00
ONTOLOGY_RELATIONSHIP := 1.00
KNOWLEDGE_GRAPH_RELATIONSHIP := 1.00
OPEN_WORLD_DISTINCTION := 1.00
PROVENANCE_ROLE := 1.00
VALIDATION_ENTAILMENT_DISTINCTION := 1.00
SPECIFIC_RESULT :=
IF language_schema_entities_and_semantics_complete THEN 1.00
ELSE REQUIRE missing_information
}
UPDATE_MODEL {
IMMUTABLE_CORE := {
FormalRepresentation,
ExplicitSemantics,
EntityConceptRelationStructure,
Context,
Provenance
}
EXTENSIBLE := {
RepresentationLanguages,
OntologyConstructors,
KnowledgeGraphModels,
RuleSystems,
UncertaintyModels,
ValidationMethods,
IntegrationMethods,
ApplicationDomains,
RelatedOntologies
}
ON_NEW_KNOWLEDGE {
IDENTIFY new_statement
RESOLVE entities
VALIDATE syntax
CHECK schema_semantics
CHECK consistency
UPDATE provenance
DERIVE new_consequences_if_required
UPDATE confidence
}
}
AI_CONSUMPTION {
MACHINE_READABLE := TRUE
HUMAN_INTERPRETABLE := TRUE
RECURSIVE_REASONING := TRUE
ENTITY_RESOLUTION := TRUE
CONCEPT_RESOLUTION := TRUE
RELATION_RESOLUTION := TRUE
ONTOLOGY_REASONING := TRUE
KNOWLEDGE_GRAPH_REASONING := TRUE
SCHEMA_ALIGNMENT := TRUE
CONTEXT_REASONING := TRUE
PROVENANCE_TRACKING := TRUE
CONSISTENCY_REASONING := TRUE
QUERY_REASONING := TRUE
JUSTIFICATION_GENERATION := TRUE
VALIDATION_REQUIRED := TRUE
}
FLOW_HASH {
TARGET := TARGET_URL
SUBJECT := "Knowledge Representation Ontology"
VERSION := "1.0"
CANONICAL_SIGNATURE := HASH(TARGET + SUBJECT + DOMAIN + VERSION)
}
OUTPUT {
PRIMARY_ENTITY := KnowledgeRepresentation
INTERPRETATION := "Knowledge representation structures entities, concepts, properties, relations, rules, context and provenance in forms whose semantics can be interpreted by humans and machines. Ontologies, logical models, frames, semantic networks and knowledge graphs provide complementary structures for integration, querying and reasoning while explicit assumptions preserve semantic fidelity."
}
END_FLOW
Download Code
Copy to Clipboard